Serbian.

A little expedition to a Gallo-Roman ruin near Margerides in Gaul.

Magyar. Serbian.
It has been said before, on this blog, that our forebears were better than us. Or if you like: that we were better in long forgotten previous lives. It has also been said, on this blog, that Judeo-Christianity is the main reason for this fall. It is not the only reason, though, and you might well argue that the mixing of species that occurred long before Antiquity is in fact an even more important reason for our fall. And you might well be right if you do. The mixing of species ruined us, stripped us of our natural defenses, and then Judeo-Christianity crept into our broken world like a worm, finishing us off with it’s poison– turning us into feeble, coward, useless, worthless and ugly shadows of what we once was.

Naturally reality is more complicated than that, and there are so many factors that have contributed to our fall. The worst is perhaps the factors that made us turn everything on it’s head: the deepest and darkest wells became the tallest and fairest towers; the foulest trolls became the most beautiful elves; the dearest brothers became the most hated enemies; and the vilest laziness became the greatness of mankind! ‘Harmony’ turned into ‘civilization’. ‘Survival of the fittest’ turned into ‘survival of the laziest’.

Aye, this is what happened: man began to invent not because he was brilliant, because he was creative or because he had great visions! No! He began to invent because he was lazy, because he no longer coped with his situation, and because he was left behind in the natural race. He became a failed hunter, so he needed better hunting tools and hunting techniques. He became a bad navigator, so he needed tools to assist him in that context too. He became worse at everything, because of the mixing of species.

With time – as the European man continued to fall – he kept inventing things, that were to make life easier for him – and easier and easier. And the more he invented, the less he himself needed to be of any quality whatsoever to survive, so he just fell faster and faster, as time went by. The once skilled, brave and happy hunter-gatherer became a fat, burger-eating, TV-watching subhuman, so lazy he needed a car to even bother picking up the mail 50 yards from his front door. With time he will become so degenerate that he is no longer able to reproduce at all, even with the help of modern medicine, and then mankind on this planet will cease to exist.

Aye, this is the fruits of civilization. This is the inevitable end of the ‘civilized’ man, unless of course technology ends us before that happens. And yet we celebrate this darkest and deepest well as the fairest and tallest of towers…. We are proud of what we have created! Fools amongst us even use it to prove our (European) superiority to others.

My wife has suggested several times, that what we create today is just replacements for abilities that we had before. Before the mixing of species we didn’t need any of it: not computers, not star maps, not compasses, certainly not cars, not cameras, not electricity. Not anything modern. We could sense directions, just like many animals can. We could photograph with our minds. We could store immense ammounts of data in our brains. Etc. The mixing if species left us with an emptiness, a void inside us, that we since then tried to fill with…. all this technology, and not least with art. So we remember a harmony that we can no longer achieve. We try to, over and over again, but we are not able to. So no matter what we do, we end up disappointed. There is no ‘salvation’. There is no escape. There is no solution. We just don’t have what we need to achieve what we want: what we had before we mixed.

So we degenerate. So we accelerate our own destruction, with more and more technology, with more and more mixing of species and races. The European man commits suicide… and the other species and races will be dragged down into the abyss with him – no matter what they do. They have been in the same boat for quite some time already. Mankind is doomed!

Ah, well. What can one say but ‘good riddance’? I shed no tears for people running willingly into their own doom. I will encourage them to do so, as soon as possible. “Run you pigs, run right into the slaughter house!” See if I care. We are better off without them. The entire planet Earth is better off without them. *spit*

You see, ‘mankind’ is an interesting entity. It is in no need of 7 or 8 billion human beings to exist, to survive and thrive. In fact, it survived and thrived much better in the past, when it was made up of maybe only 100,000 human beings in all – all over the planet. It is still ‘mankind’. If 99.99% of today’s ‘mankind’ jumps off a cliff and dies, ‘mankind’ will probably be much better off tomorrow… because those who didn’t jump off that cliff will not only pose less of a threat to the harmony of this planet, but will probably also be made up of those who wanted to live, who wanted not to cultivate laziness, stupidity and degeneration. Those who didn’t jump off that cliff would probably still not achieve harmony with anything at all, but they would have the wisdom to think that: “If we do the right thing, if we cultivate only the strong, beautiful, the healthy and natural man, then one day we will”.

Most human beings today do jump off that cliff. They follow the herd into the abyss, into their own doom, thinking nothing thereupon. As an Ôðalist I will instead start the long and hard walk back to Harmony; on overgrown paths, through thickset forests and brushwood, life after life after life, until I one day will finally have returned to the place from whence I came. Purified. Improved. Restored.

HailaR WôðanaR!

Magyar. Serbian.

A little slide-show about some of the fruits of “progress” and “growth” in our world.

The Dark Ages is a term used to describe the period between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance. It is called by that name because “The period is characterized by a relative scarcity of historical and other written records at least for some areas of Europe, rendering it obscure to historians”. We can also read that: “The concept of a Dark Age originated with the Italian scholar Petrarch (Francesco Petrarca) in the 1330s, and was originally intended as a sweeping criticism of the character of Late Latin literature. Petrarch regarded the post-Roman centuries as “dark” compared to the light of classical antiquity. Later historians expanded the term to refer to the transitional period between Roman times and the High Middle Ages (c. 11th–13th century), including the lack of Latin literature, and a lack of contemporary written history, general demographic decline, limited building activity and material cultural achievements in general. Later historians and writers picked up the concept, and popular culture has further expanded on it as a vehicle to depict the Middle Ages as a time of backwardness, extending its pejorative use and expanding its scope.”

As we know, the fall of Rome came shortly after the introduction of Judeo-Christianity as the official cult, and we also know that the Renaissance was a renaissance of the ‘Pagan’ (i. e. European) culture, ideals, philosophy, science and values, that by the 14^th century had began to return to Europe from the Muslim world via crusaders and Muslim invaders. Unlike the Judeo-Christians, who burned and destroyed everything European they came across, the Muslims had kept the European literature they came across.

The early Dark Ages are described as “The Migration Period”, when different European tribes moved about: first Huns and Goths, Vandals, Saxons, Jutes and Angles and other Germanic tribes, then Slavs and others too. They were – according to history – forced to move by other tribes. History don’t say much about why this migration period came about in the first place though, why the first tribes started to migrate, pushing others to do the same. We do however know why the Scandinavians started to move about in the Viking Age, and we know that they were not forced to move by other migrating tribes: they started to move about because of the aggression of Judeo-Christians in the south. Yes, interestingly, the “moving about” of tribes correspond well only with the spread of Judeo-Christianity in Europe… After Southern Europe had been Christianized, the spread of Judeo-Christianity came first to Western Europe, then to Eastern Europe, then finally to Northern Europe. And wherever it came the tribes started to ‘migrate’.

Rather than tell us what happened in this time of “demographic decline”, historians today just – safely – state that “we don’t know”. It’s a Dark Age….

That is of course very convenient for the Judeo-Christians, whose historians basically say that: “Judeo-Christianity rose in the Roman Empire in spite of the cruel and unjust persecution by the emperors, then the Roman Empire fell (because of pressure from “barbarians”, must say: not because of the disruptive, criminal and destructive work of Judeo-Christians inside the Roman Empire….) and after a few hundred years of historical darkness, that we don’t know much about, most of Europe emerged Judeo-Christian.”

We have written sources describing how the Romans, the Scandinavians, the Balts and the Finns resisted the Christianization violently, but conveniently we have no sources describing how the other Europeans reacted (but we are told to believe that the other European tribes were simply converted….because the message of “Jesus” is so true and convincing, of course). We just know that they started to “migrate” and that there was “demographic decline” in Europe at the time. And then when history was being recorded again they were all Judeo-Christians. Hallelujah!

*sigh*

***

Let me tell you what I think happened: the Judeo-Christians destroyed the Roman Empire from within, and whilst doing so the “barbarian” peoples of Europe defended themselves, from the Judeo-Christian poison coming from the Roman Empire, by attacking the Roman Empire – just like the Scandinavians defended themselves from the same poison a few hundred years later, in the Viking Age, by attacking mainly the Judeo-Christian missionary centers (i. e. monasteries) in Judeo-Christian Europe.

The conversion of Europeans was – as described in the later Scandinavian Viking Age sources – by means of threats, violence, torture, hostage taking, child abduction and murder. The Judeo-Christians operated the most ruthless, violent and cruel mafias, with the Pope and the Great Patriarch as the godfathers, and gained power in the same manner as criminal organisations today gain power.

This caused entire tribes to migrate, to flee from their terror, in an attempt to get away from them. So the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, the Belgae etc. fled to Pagan lands, the British Isles. Others charged head on, and sacked Rome (again…). Yet others moved entirely out of Europe, like the Vandals.

When the Judeo-Christian sicarii-like mob came to Scandinavia, just before the Viking Age, this was the reason for the sudden ‘Viking’ activity, and only then came ‘The Viking Age”, and many there too fled, to Ireland, to Scotland, to Iceland and even to the Americas, where the Judeo-Christians were weak or where they had no power at all, or they charged head on and sacked the monasteries from whence the terrorists came, and cut them down like the genocidal criminals they were.

Yes, I think the ‘demographic decline’ in Europe from year 400 to 800 was the result of a genocide perpetrated by the Judeo-Christians. They were terrorizing and killing Europeans en masse, men and women, young and old, boys and girls, and even infants – and we don’t know about this because they covered up their crime by – conveniently – erasing 400 years of written history. And they could do that: they wrote this history themselves, they kept the books themselves, in their monasteries. Getting rid of these books was no problem. So they did (and they still do the same, even to the events we have experienced in our own age: they erase or re-write history as they see fit).

To us it’s just a dark age, that we “know nothing about”, and then we are supposed to believe that Europe accepted Judeo-Christianity willingly, without resistance. The Viking Age is written off as the fruits of Scandinavian “barbarism” and “Pagan aggression”, and the Roman resistance was just absurd, and only a result of ignorance. “They even accused the Judeo-Christians of cannibalism, ha ha ha”. How ridicules. Right?

***

The hard facts are that Europe after the Christianization and before the Renaissance is referred to by modern scientists (including archaeologists) like this: “general demographic decline, limited building activity and material cultural achievements in general.” These are the fruits of Judeo-Christianity. Europe before Judeo-Christianity was prosperous, scientifically advanced, educated, healthy, spiritually advanced, culturally advanced and artistically advanced, and all of this did only return to Europe with the Renaissance, the beginning of the end of Judeo-Christianity in Europe, when Europe started to find back to its own roots. Europe started the long walk back to life, after having suffered in the Judeo-Christian darkness for so long.

Judeo-Christian art from the Dark Ages:

European art from before the Christianization:

European art from after the Renaissance

Pre-Judeo-Christian European art intentionally destroyed and desecrated (with crosses) by Judeo-Christians during the Christianization: 

We are still walking, or rather climbing uphill, back to Olympus, so to speak. We still struggle to get rid of the darkness, but we prevail: every day we live we prevail over their darkness. We have found the light of our forebears, and no amount of Judeo-Christian darkness can extinguish that light.

Finally, I will add a note on how to destroy Judeo-Christianity in Europe, and remove it from our soil, lock stock and barrel: we just have to inform our young about the nature and origin of Judeo-Christianity, and raise them as good Europeans instead. No informed, sane, well-fed, healthy and free human being will ever convert or has ever converted to Judeo-Christianity!

Forget about the old: they are lost to brainwash and shame and are soon dead anyhow, from old age, but we must make sure that they take their perverse foreign cult with them when they die. Judeo-Christianity can in theory be completely removed from Europe in only one single generation! So let us do so! If we do all our other problems will go away too, because Judeo-Christianity is the root to just about all our problems today!

Hail the European tribes still alive!

A Judeo-Christian image showing how they treated the European art and culture:

French. Magyar. Serbian.

First some music.

In case you didn’t know: I don’t enjoy writing. I don’t want to write. I don’t plan to write. I fact, every time I do write something, like I do now with this post for the TP blog, I plan not to write anything more, ever again, but I always fail to do so. I fail because I feel a strong need to ensure the survival of the most essential parts of our European (Pagan) culture, and to do so I have to write down what I know about this, and what others don’t seem to know, and eventually publish what I write in form of books.

Every man must die, but a tribe can live forever. I worry not about my life; my life is good and I have no complaints personally, and if I die today I die knowing that I spent my time well. But I worry about the life of my tribe, my people, my race. Our Pagan culture is the foundation on which we stand. Without it we will fall, sink into the ground – like we are doing today, and like we have done the last thousand years – and eventually disappear from the face of the earth. As part of my tribe I don’t want that to ever happen: I am alive, my survival instincts are intact, so I keep writing… to ensure that the foundation remains strong and powerful. To ensure that our glorious, thoroughly good and deeply honest tribes will be able to at one point rid itself of the foreign yoke, Judeo-Christianity, and then return to greatness, in mind, blood and spirit, and live honourable lives again, like we did in the days of yore.

The blood of our Pagan forebears is in us, so we can remember and miss that Golden Age of Europe. We can feel the longing deep within our hearts and minds. We can remember the Europe that was not committing suicide, that was not destroying itself.

And we can miss it.

And we can work to make it return.

Hail the European Deities! Hail and Joy!

Magyar. Serbian.

Thanks to John Graham for sharing this excellent film: 

Remember Herkus Mantas and the genocide against the Balts by the Teutonic knights.

Remember Niklot and the genocide against the Wends by the Christian Saxons.

Remember Widukind and the genocide against the Saxons by the Christian Franks.

Bulgarian. Serbian. Spanish.

Science is not a new thing; ever since we came to be here on Earth we have tried to understand the world we live in. The first to do so, the first scientists, were sorcerers, who tried to figure out the relationship between the spirits of nature and man. Their spells and other activities often resulted in highly scientific results, and e. g. medicine – yes even modern medicine – is based on their work. In Classical Antiquity we saw much more scientific work, but science in Europe was then interrupted by about a thousand years of darkness, as Judeo-Christianity prevailed in Europe. We emerged from this suffocating darkness when the European (i. e. Pagan) ideals resurfaced, in the Renaissance, and ever since science has been advancing in the same speed as Judeo-Christianity has retreated.

Science has never been completely honest though: even from the beginning the sorcerers often understood that at least some of the things they did were pure humbug, but in order to keep their power – as sorcerer-kings and rulers of society – they kept up the charade.

Sorcery was with time replaced by religion (actually a horrible set-back to science), and was then eventually replaced by a religion of ‘reason’, of science itself: the priest was replaced by the scientist, the words of “God” by scientific laws, “the Creation” by “The Big Bang” and the saviour was replaced by Einstein. Rather than be burned alive for pointing at the illogical properties of the current trend in belief systems, the critics of modern science are thoroughly ridiculed and ‘socially castrated’ – or even diagnosed with all sorts of horrible and emberrassing mental illnesses. If you question any of their “laws” or point at less praiseworthy sides of Einstein you will be viciously attacked by them and their followers – i. e. the media and other servants of the system. Or as one can say: by the zealots of the new religion called “science”.

The scientists do just like the priests of the past: they talk about ‘miracles’ (of science) and present their interpretations of events that the majority has no opportunity to in any way validate. So if a priest can swear that he knows that Jesus walked on water, then you just have to trust that he in fact did. Likewise, if a scientists says that this or that is true, then you just have to trust that to be true. His colleges confirm that he is right, so why would you doubt him? Before “God has said so” was enough to install blind obedience and trust, and today “it is scientifically proven” does the same.

In effect, man today is no less a slave to the will of the priests, to the sorcerers and their humbug.

Sorcery had spirits, the priests have a ‘saviour’, and science has Einstein. Even today we don’t really know if spirits exist, we have found no way to prove or disprove it, and whether Jesus was real or not is not even relevant, because even if he was real it doesn’t mean that he was anything like the priests say he was like, and Einstein…. Yes, what can we say about Einstein? I will let Ian Mosley say a few words about Einstein.

So Einstein was a plagiarist and a fraud. The one most known and famous symbol of modern science was a fraud! Interesting… And they do their best to keep this a secret. Just like the sorcerers did their best to keep it a secret that their spells didn’t actually work; just like the priests keep it a secret that Jesus never even existed, but is just a fictional character created by “cut and paste” activity; by stealing ideas from other religions. 

Is all science a fraud then? Of course not. But modern science is being misused to enslave us all, to seduce, to fool and to dupe us all, and to ensure that we all serve the agenda of those in power – i. e. those who control science.

So what are we left with? Disillusionment? Yes. And where do we stand? Are we back to where we started? Sorcery? Well, in a sense yes. We still have no idea about even the laws of nature, and we can – through reason alone – understand that much of what the scientists tell us is plain wrong. That is, if you have the courage to think for yourself, of course. Not many do: most just want to fit in and follow the herd. The prospect of having to live justly in solitude is more scary to them than the prospect of having to walk shamefully into certain doom along with the herd.

We need to throw all dogmas out the windows, and start from scratch. We need to get rid of all respect for the scientists and their claimed results, and be rude enough to question everything anew. Today we don’t ask, because we are told that Einstein was a genius and had the answers, and we are too stupid to know better than him. Only he wasn’t a genius: he was a fraud… and many others in science were frauds too. How many?

Question everything you hear. Think everything over, and see if it makes sense. If it does, believe in it. If it doesn’t, don’t trust it to be true. No matter what scientists say; don’t trust them. Trust your faculties of reason instead.

Hail WôðanaR (Óðinn), the anthropomorphised faculty reason!

French. Serbian. Spanish.

A long time ago our forebears practised what we would call sorcery: they cast spells to influence the spirits of nature. Some were better at this than others were, and yearly contests were organised to make sure that the tribe at all times had the best suited to be their sorcerer-king and sorcerer-queen. The king was selected based on his skills, strength, intelligence and good health. The queen was selected based on her innocence, patience and beauty.

We know this May couple and the May contests from both our fairy tales, mythology and traditional songs.

With time it became clear that the sorcerer’s spells didn’t always work, and some societies changed: rather than rely on the spell-casting skills of a sorcerer, they began to address the spirits more directly, and simply asked them to comply. When doing so the hermaphroditic spirits were athropomorphised and given a name and gender: so the spirit of lightning was called “Lightning”, in Scandinavia Loki (“lightning”, from the PIE root *luk-), the spirit of thunder was called “Thunderer”, in Scandianvia Þórr (“thunderer”), etc. The trees and animals these spirits had originally been associated with turned into the attributes of the deities. So Þórr’s temple was based around an oak tree, and his carriage was said to be pulled by goats. Freyja’s temple was based around a cherry tree, and her carriage was said to be pulled by cats. Etc.

The society was still penetrated on all levels by the idea of sorcery (‘sympathetic magic’) though, so in order to gain the powers of the deities man – i. e. priests and priestesses – could simply impersonate the deities. E. g. by dressing up as a goddess, by impersonating her, by taking her name a girl became her, and thus also gained all her powers. The gods and goddesses of the temples were thus very much real: they were there themselves! Listening to the prayers of man, eating the sacrificed animals, healing injured men, and being pulled or carried around to the fields to bless them, etc. The deities were real! The sorcerer-king and sorcerer-queen were thus replaced by the god-king and the goddess-queen, but not much changed, really.

Yearly contests were still organised to make sure that the tribe at all times had the best suited to be their god-king and goddess-queen. The king was still selected based on his skills, strength, intelligence and good health. The queen was still selected based on her innocence, patience and beauty.

The winners of these annual contests were given an apple. The aging man stood no chance of winning an Olympic games type contest against younger and stronger men, and the aging girl stood no chance of winning a beauty contest against younger and more beautiful girls. Thus the deities were kept young forever, by the help of Íðunn’s apples.

Related posts here and here. 

Serbian. Spanish.

As explained here, our forebears didn’t believe in “gods” as we today often understand the term. The term “god” in English is an Anglo-Saxon term, and the original meaning is simply “good”, “good thing”, “good deed”, “benefit”, “goodness” or “welfare”. The good and beneficial spirits of nature were hailed as “gods”, and the harmful and some times even malevolent spirits of nature were naturally not.

The European deities were (and still are) ideals, positive concepts such as “the spirit of honesty” or “the spirit of justice”, and unless impersonated by men or women, actors playing the role of certain gods or goddesses, these deities naturally never answered the prayers of men. So there was no pathological relationship between the Pagan European and his deities. He was not at all relating to his deities like the Judeo-Christians do in relation to their “god”. He did not hear voices, “the voice of god”, when there were in fact nobody speaking to him. He did not expect nothing to produce something. He did not address nothing.

Who is this guy talking to?

His sacrifices were to real deities; he gave something to his deity and then got something in return. His prayers were addressed to real deities; he asked for something, negotiated with his deity, and then they agreed on something. He could see and touch and communicate with his deities: the deities were real! The deities were impersonated by men and women of flesh and blood. The deities were kept forever young, immortal, by the yearly selections.

This was the case in Ancient Greece, Ancient Scandinavia, Ancient Gaul, Ancient Britannia, Ancient Egypt, Ancient Persia etc., wherever men of European stock dwelled.

A very much real deity

The spirits of nature are very much real too, and they are called spirits because they are not physicals. They are what we would call ideals: honesty, courage, justice, health, beauty, purity, innocence, kindness, love, etc. These ideals – spirits – were seen everywhere in nature. A particularly courageous animal would be an animal linked to the spirit of courage, a particularly kind animal would be an animal linked to the spirit of kindness, a particular strong tree would be a tree linked to the god of strength, etc. You an always argue that “there are no spirits”, but you would be as wrongs as if you argued that there is no honesty, courage, justice, health, beauty, purity, innocence, kindness, love, etc-

Two more real deities

The European deities were thus very much real.  

Bulgarian. Serbian. Spanish.

First some music… 

As explained here and here, our forebears believed in reincarnation and the eternal existence of the honourable man. There was no “punishment” for the bad, and no “reward” for the good, other than rebirth – here on Earth, in the kin – for the honourable.

What they believed was that when you died your body went to Hel (“hidden”), i. e. the burial mound/grave. This was a cold, dark and damp place, but it was really just a name for the grave. Our dead bodies return to earth, as simple as that. Your mind (called “soul” by the Judeo-Christians) was sent to heaven to be purified by the fire of the Sun. Again, like with Hel, there was no ‘punishment’ or ‘suffering’ involved. You just had to remove the bad parts with cleansing fire, to make sure they did not return when you were reborn into a new body.

The amount of ‘you’ to be reborn was equal to the ‘amount of your mind’ that would be left after the cleansing fire had removed the bad parts. Thus the truly honourable could be reborn ‘in full’, so to speak. Others had only small fragments of their minds reborn, and of course yet others – the thoroughly rotten – were simply removed. They ceased to be, they ceased to exist. They passed into oblivion.

The most honourable dead were buried in beautiful graves, and when the children grew old enough they could chose themselves whom they were to be reborn as. The more honour a dead person had, the more children would be interested in being reborn as him.

Men often chose to bring their most valuable possessions with them into the graves when they died, to make sure that they could keep them in the next life as well – and possibly also to entice children to chose to be reborn as them, if their honour was not enough. So the more honour and the more wealth a dead person had, the greater the probability that a child would choose to be reborn as him.

If a dead person was never chosen by a child, then he would never be reborn. So the honour itself was not enough: the honourable dead had to be chosen by a child as well, in order to be reborn. There was no automatic rebirth even for the most honourable.

European Pagans also let the fire purify in life:

You might argue that there is no evidence to support the belief in reincarnation. You might claim that there is no such thing. Ok, but as I see it we will be better off if we live in societies where people believe in reincarnation than we are in societies where people believe in either nothing (atheists) or in some fictional “Heavenly Paradise” (Judeo-Christianity). It doesn’t matter if it is real or not: what matters is that people who believe that they are to be reborn here on Earth, in the same society, will do their best to ensure the happiness and health of their descendants!

Will you catch all the fish in the ocean, kill all game in the forest, chop down all the trees or pump up all the oil and use it all in your lifetime, if you believe that you will be reborn here on Earth? Will you leave nothing for your future reborn self? Of course not. You will instead try to preserve all that is good, to create more good, and try to pass it on to those who come after you – to yourself in future lives.

I care not if I actually am to be reborn or not, if reincarnation is real or not, but I see the value of such a belief system for my species, and understand that only such a belief system will ensure the survival of all that is good and just. Only such a belief system will enable the betterment of our species. No matter what you think, say or feel; all the alternatives are worse in all respects, because whether we like it or not: man is an egotistical creature. Rather than try to suppress man’s ego, we should use it to cultivate great societies.

HailaR WôðanaR!

The purifying fire of the Sun:

Bulgarian. Serbian.

Our forebears believed that the honourable dead could be reborn, by entering the burial mound and collecting the life force of the dead inside. In the Stone Age they collected the thigh bone (the life force) and the skull (the mind) of the dead, to become them. When they left the burial mound with these totem items, as the Sun rose, they were seen as reborn. The dead had returned from the realm of death!

If you believe that a life force can be collected like that, then the idea of taking the life force of another creature, and put it outside your own as protection, to become invulnerable or at least much stronger, is not too far fetched. The same can be said about the idea of hiding your own life force away somewhere, and then use another creature’s life force instead, meaning that if you are harmed, it is not you, but the creature whose life force you use that is harmed.

So one thing we often hear about in fairy tales and myths, is the invulnerable hero. Nothing can harm him, because he has been dipped into the river Styx (Achilles), because he wears the skin of the Nemean lion (Herakles) or because he wears the skin of a bear, a wolf or a boar (“berserks”). Others are invulnerable because their life force has been protected (BalðuR) or hidden away somewhere else (the trolls of fairy tales).

To make the hero (or troll) vulnerable you have to first find his life force, or find the spot where he is vulnerable. E. g. Achilles is vulnerable only where he mother held him, when she dipped him into the river Styx; BalðuR can only be harmed by the mistletoe (which is actually his life force) and the trolls can only be harmed by destroying their life force.

***

Today we might laugh when we see such ‘superstitions’, but at the same time we are still completely dominated by the same ‘superstitions’. The same totemic ideas penetrate all layers of society. We live by the idea that we gain some sort of life force, protective force, or other force, from using or surrounding ourselves with certain brands, symbols or even bits and pieces of others whom we think highly of.

By driving a car of a certain brand you gain some sort of force: by wearing the clothes of a certain brand you gain some sort of force: by wearing a certain symbol you gain some sort of force: by putting on a t-shirt with a certain band name on it, you gain some sort of force, etc. You somehow feel that you become what the brand is associated with, you gain the force symbolized by the symbol, you become a part of the band whose shirt you wear, etc.

The Sorcerer, as we often see him:

You can always ridicule others who do this, who buy expensive cars of certain brands because they feel better in them, who need to wear clothes of this or that brand, who wears a Thor’s hammer or a crucifix around the neck, who want the signature from artists they appreciate, etc., but the truth is: on some level we all do this. This is how we are built. This is what we are. This is deeply rooted in our human nature. And there is nothing wrong with our nature!

Whether we like to admit it or not, we all believe in sorcery. We don’t always understand that we do, but we do. Rather than fight, ignore or ridicule this ‘sorcery’, we should embrace and celebrate it, and try to learn more about it, for the betterment of our species.

Related post here and here.

HailaR WôðanaR!

Serbian. Spanish.

Scholars today often fail to see the continuity of the belief system of our forebears through the ages, and thus often claim every new thing that seems to appear is a result of some alien influence, usually an invasion by some fictional people or even a complete replacement of the former population.

One might wonder if they claim this because they have a sinister agenda, or perhaps only because they have been programmed to behave in a certain (politically correct) manner, and especially so in relation to European cultures.

What we should do though, when we approach our own culture, is to understand that there is a thin red line through all of it, through all ages and all European cultures. Everything is basically the same, but there are four different ways of seeing it.

The key to the oldest sources is to know that in the most ancient of times our forebears were hunter-gatherers and believed in spirits (sorcery). After that we see the introduction of both agriculture and deities (religion) as we know them today. Not all hunter-gatherers became agriculturalists though, and not all agriculturalists replaced their belief in spirits with a belief in deities.

So there were four different cultures based around the same original culture: a hunter-gatherer sorcery culture, a hunter-gatherer religious culture, an agricultural sorcery culture and an agricultural religious culture.

Further, these cultures didn’t or didn’t always replace the older dominating culture, but often existed alongside each other — often at the same place.

Although simplified, it works well to define these four like this:

Seiðr (belief in spirits/sorcery) + Veiðr (hunter-gatherer) = The old tradition

Seiðr (belief in spirits/sorcery) + Byggjandi (agriculturalist) = The tradition

Ásatrú (belief in deities/religion) + Veiðr (hunter-gatherer) = The old religion

Ásatrú (belief in deities/religion) + Byggjandi (agriculturalist) = The religion

When we do that we can look at the high festivals, myths and other traditions and make so much more sense of them.

Knowing this it e. g. makes sense that the spirit of the forest is pictured as an elk in Scandinavian rock carvings, but is described as a deity, Víðarr (“wood”, “forest”), some thousand years later. We know they are the same, simply by looking at other names for Víðarr: he was known also as Elgr, which of course means “elk”.

Norwegian: Elg

Norse: Elgr

Proto-nordic: *AlgiR

Proto-Germanic: *Algiz

Proto-Indo-European: *Alci-

(PS. Latin: Alcis)

Even today we call the elk “the king of the forest” in Scandinavia. Well, now you know why…

So when you see petroglyphs with images of elks in Scandinavia, they are Bronze- or Stone Age depictions of Víðarr, the silent god of the forest. Or if you like: when you read myths about Víðarr, you read about the elk in the petroglyphs. What you know about one of these ages can be transferred to the other.

When you possess this key you might be able to see a large four-dimensional picture, rather than just tiny two-dimensional fragments of it.

HailaR WôðanaR!

One thing that is rather odd, is that Christians seems to think that they have some sort of monopoly on morals and good behaviour, that the Europeans before the Christianisation were just a bunch of amoral lunatics, raping, killing, pillaging, drinking and having no moral attitudes or self discipline whatsoever. They are often Christians because they are good and moral themselves (they are Europeans in blood after all), and wrongly believe that they need to take the consequence of that and therefore become or remain Christians. They know no other good and moral alternative.

Many modern so-called Pagans seems to think the same, and mistake Heathendom with Hedonism, and use their cartoonish mock-Paganism as an excuse to be amoral and live what the Christians would call ‘a life in sin’ – and what a real Pagan would call ‘a life without Honour’.

Well, I have no problems with what is perceived as traditional ‘Christian’ values and morals: loyalty, family values, kindness, honesty, self discipline (or ‘moderation’) etc.. But let me be perfectly clear: these are not ‘Christian’ values! These are values the Christians adopted from Paganism – or rather kept – when they were Christianized. You can even argue that these are values they kept in spite of the Christianisation: these are the European values the Judeo-Christians failed to eradicate, when they created the Christian cult to destroy Rome (and later the rest of Europe).

As a Pagan European I am not the opposite of Christian Europeans. My problem with them is not their morals, but their embrace of an international and racist religion bent on mixing all races and destroying all cultures and religions on this planet – and replace them all with just ‘Christians’ (of any race or any mix) and Judeo-Christian culture. They have done their best to destroy our European culture for more than a thousand years, and they still try to complete this task.

When you meet Europeans who identify themselves as ‘Christians’, remember this: they don’t need Christianity to justify being moral. The exact same good values and morals are embraced in our European religion too. Paganism is not a excuse to sleep around, drink, take drugs or in other ways behave like a complete idiot. Paganism is the foundation on which all good traditions and morals stand! And unlike Christianity, Paganism is without dangerous alien influence, or even alien control, from some non-European tribe not at all friendly towards Europe and European culture. And unlike Christianity, Paganism is friendly towards all other non-aggressive and non-expansionist religions and cultures on this planet, and seek not to destroy them and replace them with the worship of one non-European tribe and their self-proclaimed right to destroy and enslave all others.

All Christian Europeans who seriously want to ensure the survival of Europe as a biological entity should open their eyes to this, cast the anti-European and racist Christianity aside like a wet towel, and become real Europeans again. Only a Pagan European is ‘a European mind in a European body’. 

Related post here and here.

Hail the European Gods! Hail and Joy!

“In hoc signo vinces” 

How many times have you not heard praise of ‘civilization’ and the ‘civilized’ man? These city-builders and city-dwellers are universally praised as the most advanced of men. But are they? But were they really?

The first known (…) civilizations on this planet were all built not by Neanderthals, not by racially pure Europeans; not by the Nordic man most European racists today think so highly of. No! They were built by mongrel populations; in Mesopotamia, in Egypt, in Persia and in the Indus Valley. Later the Greeks built cities too, but only after they had been sufficiently racially mixed not to look like Nordics anymore. Later the Romans too built cities, but only after they too had been sufficiently racially mixed not to look like Nordics anymore.

The civilization we have in Europe today too was built by ‘mongrels’: the Romans. Yes, if you are in doubt, know that all cities, all civilization, in Europe, is based on and stems directly from Roman and Judeo-Christian civilisation. The racially pure Europe was barbarian and uncivilized. Britannia. Gaul. Germania. Scandinavia. Baltica. Slavia. Dacia. Aquitania. Suomi. Scythia. Sarmatia. Illyria. Thracia. Etc.

If you think I am wrong, then think about this for a minute. First of all, take a look at cities today: who are drawn to them? Compare them to the countryside and then tell me: where do you find the most mongrels? Exactly: you find them almost exclusively in the cities. And if they can choose, almost all of them go live in the cities. Why? Because that is the natural habitat of the mongrel. The natural habitat of the racially pure individual on the other hand is the pristine nature; un-touched, un-soiled, un-polluted, wild, dangerous and beautiful. You find close to no mongrels there, and if you do you probably do because some racially pure individual has dragged them along.

Civilizations are horribly self-destructive: with time they all eventually fall. They all go down in tragedy and leave the citizens dead or dying, eliminated by their own decadence, crime, stupidity and the degenerative life-style of the city, and not least by epidemics. The few who escape these death traps quickly die in nature, because they are no longer naturally fit for life, after living for generations in ‘cities’.

The ones who are the most likely to survive the collapse of a civilization are those who do not live in cities: the commonly much more racially pure individuals living in the countryside, as close as they can get to their natural habitat: the pristine nature…

PS. You live in the city, and you hate it? Well, maybe because you are not meant to live there.

So why do you?… 

First some music….

Today we need technology to survive, not least because groups hostile to us and bent on destroying us are equipping themselves with all the technology they can get their hands on. Also, we have to achknowledge the fact that we do need some technology no matter what, even in an ideal world. I mean; even a javelin and a knife used for hunting is a type of technology.

Before I continue I wish to separate between technology that is necessary and not detrimental to either the environment or man himself, and technology that is not necessary and is detrimental to the environment and man himself. For the sake of simplicity, I will call these ‘good’ and ‘bad’ technologies respectively.

A serious problem with bad technology is that is interferes with the positive natural selection, and even promotes the decay of man. The man without any natural abilities suddenly is given an opportunity not only to survive, but to survive at the expense of those better than him.

E. g. the hunter no longer needs skill or courage, but can just shoot any creature from a safe distance and location, with some rifles up to 2 km away. In fact, industrial farming even makes hunting obsolete, and has removed man so much from the natural processes (even the process of feeding himself) that he has completely lost all healthy and normal links to nature – and the man with no such links to nature will easily destroy everything natural. So the modern man does: in his environment and in himself.

In the long run this bad technology ruins mankind, and the once creative, skilled, brave, healthy and sane man slowly but surely turns into a terrible and sub-human creature, suffering from all sorts of ills – both physically and mentally. At one point mankind will become so degenerated that it will not even be able to uphold the high tech society it has created for itself, and what will then happen?… Yes, man will eventually become so degenerated that he will not be physically able to change even a simple light bulb, or even understand how to do so.

Survivors?

In the long run this bad technology also ruins the environment mankind needs to survive. Forests formerly full of herbs and game are turned into fields producing genetically modified crops, all owned by a tiny corrupt, cruel, cynical, greedy, dishonest and sinister ‘elite’. Lakes and oceans formely boiling with fish are turned into huge dumps for garbage and chemical waste. Only the cities grow, and accelerate the decay of man even further. More bad technology is hailed as the solution to the problems created by bad technology, and there seems to be no way out of it other than through disaster…

The world depending on bad technology to uphold itself is very vulnerable to the whims of nature as well: solar storms, earthquakes, vulcano eruptions, returning Ice Ages and also just bad weather can destroy it. So even if we never run out of the energy needed to uphold the modern world, and even if man does not have the time to be ruined so much that he is no longer able to uphold world he lives in, this modern world will at some point fall into ruins.

One might wonder: how can an intelligent species willingly place itself in a situation where it will be destroyed? It is just a matter of time before this happens, and it can happen in so many ways!

Until the day comes when the modern high tech world comes crashing down, I will use bad technology to promote the dream of a simpler life, of life in ‘good tech’ societies cultivating the healthy man and his healthy relationship to the nature he lives in and is a part of. When the day comes I will be ready and able not to depend on bad technology for the survival of my kin, and so will many others.

The fall of the ‘bad tech’ modern world will not be a disaster for ‘mankind’ though, but mainly for those who did not have the wits to escape this death trap – something they fairly easily could have done by returning to a simpler life. Mankind will in fact profit from such a ‘disaster’, as it will be purified and have its ‘cancer cells’ removed. Both Mother Earth and mankind will be rejuvenated by such a ‘disaster’. Mother Nature will reclaim what has been taken from her by the ‘civilized’ man. Earth will once again grow green and rich with life. Time will remove all traces of the bad tech world, and mankind will enter a (new?) long period when bad technology will no longer be seen as something good. Perhaps even universal rules will be made, and followed, to ensure that it will take very long time before any bad technology is invented again: before man (once again?) enters a period of decline…

Survivors!

It is some times said that “there is nothing new, only what has been forgotten”, and perhaps much of it was intentionally forgotten, because some were wise enough to understand that it was bad technology.

A Simpler Life

The Coming Darkness

7 Examples of ‘good’ Technology:

Clay pots

Clothes made from natural fabrics and fur

Magnifying glasses made from quartz (… yeah, you didn’t know they had that in the Stone Age, did you? [They were used to make fire quickly])

Yurt-like tents

Accoustic musical instruments

Herbal medicine

Wax candles

7 Examples of ‘bad’ Technology:

Cars

Planes

Industrial farming (and in fact: farming itself….the hunter-gatherer lifestyle is superior to the agricultural lifestyle in all ways)

Firearms

Paved roads

Modern medicine

Electricity (in fact: everything that needs electricity to work)

Serbian.

Scholars and laymen alike seem to think of the pre-Christian religion as some sort of ferility cult, and everything is always interpreted in this light, as if fertility was all they ever worried about. All female symbols are thus seen as ‘feritlity symbols’, and even women themselves are portrayed as symbols of fertility.

You might ask yourself a simple control question that will smash all these hypotheses and theories though: “was fertility a problem to the Ancient European?” Well, why on Earth would it be? Just about all the fertility problems we have today are related to the modern lifestyle and a type of pollution they didn’t even have back then. The only fertility-related problem they might have had that we still have today would be those caused by race mixing (e. g. making the male hybrid hypersexual [to compensate for his reduced ferility he will seek to mate a lot]).

However, even when the proto-Europeans (i. e. homo neanderthalensis) first mixed with the proto-Africans (i. e. homo sapiens), probably during the Ice Age, when some of the proto-Europeans went to live in North- and East-Africa, reduced fertility was hardly a real problem. The male (but not the female) offspring of such mixes is often entirely sterile and unable to procreate, but there was no large scale mixing, and they only mixed sporadically, meaning that almost all the men would be proto-Europeans anyhow, with no fertility problems, and even the female hybrids (by the way, known to us today as “Cro Magnon”) were still fertile.

When these tribes returned to Europe, a little bit mixed, the main and most serious adverse effect of this (in a feritlity context!) was mainly a reduced survivability of the pregnant woman. Getting the women pregnant was not a problem, as it most of the time still is even today, but having the woman survive the pregnancy and not least giving birth was often a challenge, and when there was some admixture this often became a major challenge.

Women have hips designed to give birth to children who are from a racial point of view identical to themselves, so if a man of another race impregnates her and the child inherits the father’s skull shape (and the child will [statistically] 50% of the time), then that will be a major problem for the woman when she gives birth to the child. We see the same today, when African women marry European men; they have so many problems giving birth to these children that doctors often automatically (!) wants to give them a Caesarean section, to ensure the survival of both the child and the mother. Giving birth is difficult enough as it is: trying to squeeze a huge skull of another race through your hips severely increases not only the chance for your own and your child’s death, but also for brain injury to the child.

When Siegmund Freud made up his absurd, ignorant and outright delusional theories regarding the “incestous desire” of girls towards their fathers, he simply failed to understand that women are not attracted to their fathers, and don’t seek men who look like their fathers because they are. Instead they are attracted to men who look like their fathers because that will increase the chance for them to survive giving birth to that man’s children: if her mate looks like her father chances are that he will have a skull perfectly matching the shape of her hips.

When the admixture started the differences between the proto-Europeans and proto-Africans were rather big, and only a very few of the hybrid children (and their mothers) survived birth. Those children who did survive were probably almost exclusively those who inherited not the much larger European skull from their fathers, but the smaller African skulls from their mothers. Of course, it is not that simple, but by and large this was the case. So, the Cro Magnon, the direct result of this admixture, has a larger brain and skull than those found in the proto-African, but still smaller than the ones found in the proto-European. As other known mongrel creatures, the Cro Magnon also suffered from a series of problems, such as abnormal growth, bad teeth, often quite severe skeletal defects etc.

Thankfully the mixing of species was only sporadic, and with time the problems caused by this were reduced in both frequency and strength. The proto-African genes were more and more evenly distributed in the proto-European population, who for most of the time didn’t mix with them. The hybridization did change the European population though, and caused many adverse effects, but fertility was never a problem. Surviving birth remained a serious challenge for women though, as it in fact still is today – because we on average in Europe are only 99,7% European.

Related video: The Neanderthal Theory

Serbian.

The by scholars and laymen assumed ‘fertility cults’ of our forebears not only deal with human fertility, but also with the fertility of the crops. They portray ‘the goddess’ as some sort of fertility-spreading being, ensuring the fertility of the fields.

All the old Scandinavian spells (‘sorcerous songs’) I know of though deal with waking up the fields (after winter) (i. e. they deal with the planting of seeds), and then protecting the fields (from ‘bad spirits’), and not a word is said about the fertility of the fields. And again, a simple control question can crush the official theory: was the fertility of the fields ever a problem? And why on Earth would it be? Was nature under some sort of harmful influence back then, that we don’t know of today? Or did somebody sell them GMO or hybrid seeds, that would only produce one single harvest and no fertile seeds to enable them to plant again the next year (a problem we have today)? The only problems they had in this context was too much or lack of sunshine and rain, and of course parasites, crop diseases, birds eating the seeds, animals eating the produce, etc., all explained as the influence of ‘bad spirits’.

The deities generally understood as ‘fertility deities’ are actually never such. They are deities of love, of friendship, of sorcery (‘waking up’ or protecting the fields) and – most commonly and perhaps also most importantly – of youthful health and beauty (actually; two sides of the same coin).

Yes, fertility was generally speaking not a concern in any context, but having good health often was. Most commonly, this was of major importance for the women giving birth. Getting pregnant was not a challenge whatsoever, but to survive childbirth they – and their children – needed to have a good health. Commonly this was also of major importance to the field: only good health could protect it from the ‘bad spirits’, that I talk about above. So the goddesses of good health blessed them, to strengthen their health and protect them.

We then move on to the symbol of good health in pre-Christian Europe, namely the cup (often cauldron) of the Earth goddess. Today we best know this symbol from perverted and Christianized Pagan myths about ‘The Holy Grail’, but as you can understand, the cup was an attribute of the goddess of good health. Very simply put: whoever drank from it would become more healthy. Yes, drinking from this cup would remove the effect of poisons, cure diseases, heal wounds and increase the chance for pregnant women to survive childbirth.

If I may remind you of the importance of rain and sunshine for the crops, the attributes of the sky god becomes more understandable too: his scepter (originally a stone and then a stone hammer or axe) caused the thunder in the sky (like stones on the ground hit against each other produce sparks, and can be used to kindle a fire); his sword was the lightning striking from the sky as a result of this (transferring the power of the sky [the sun] to Earth), and his crown (halo) was the sun itself, shining behind him.

Together the Earth goddess and the Sky god mastered all they needed for the crops to grow: sunshine and rainfall, and good health. The attribute of the Earth goddess was also very useful for (already) pregnant women, who wanted to have enough health to survive giving birth. The attributed of the Sky god was also very useful for champions, who – when the Sky god transferred the power of the sun by placing the sword on their shoulders – became even stronger, or even invincible!

So was there really a fertility cult in Europe? Well, I at least see no traces of such a thing. And such a cult would make no sense either. 

But why do all scholars and laymen alike talk so much of this ‘fertility cult’, of the importance of fertility for the ancient man, etc.? Why on Earth do they? You can explain away much of it with mere ignorance, even more by prevailing feminist ideas, but much of it must be simply slander of the Ancient Man. It is an attempt to make us think of him as some sort of degenerate (‘he was so infertile’), as some sort of pervert (‘his entire religion revolved around having sex as much as he could’), and not least an attempt to strip the religion of our forebears of all metaphysical meaning, of course done to make it less attractive for men today.

If you want to know more about the metaphysical meaning of the European religion you can read the posts linked to in this post. 

PS. I have of course included the ‘features’ discussed in this post in the sorcery and religion of MYFAROG. :-) 

French. Serbian. Spanish.

Judeo-Christians talk about a “Creation”, and the same theory was modified by a Catholic priest in 1927, and is today known as “Big Bang”. It is the same theory, only slightly altered to fit a more ‘scientific-oriented audience’ – formulated to fuel the egos of those who think they are too good and intelligent for ‘religion’: to ensure that they remain in error.

Judeo-Christians talk about Creation taking some time too, 7 days in all, and again this theory remains. It has been altered too, but in essence still the same, known as “The Theory of Evolution”. They modified the biblical explanation a bit, and stretched the 7 days out to last for millions of year, but in essence it’s the same theory, only slightly altered to fit a more ‘scientific-oriented audience’ – formulated to fuel the egos of those who think they are too good and intelligent for ‘religion’: to ensure that they remain in error.

In reality we have no idea from whence we come or even what the universe is, why we are here or whither we are going. Neither religion nor science can provide us with any reliable answers to these questions. Instead, religion and science ensures that we don’t think about these questions, and instead just accept their illogical nonsense as absolute truths.

Although I don’t trust their theories to hold much or even any water, I am not going to claim that I know the truth in this context. I don’t. However, my mind has not been lulled into sleep by some humbug theory, whether religious or ‘scientific’ in nature. So my mind remains alert, investigating, curious and open to all and everything. It has not been ‘put to sleep in a bed called error’. I know that I know nothing.

NB. I believe in micro-evolution, but not macro-evolution.

Serbian. Spanish.

The three most important things for the pre-historic ‘primitive’ man living with nature was sunshine, rainfall and good health. Naturally, this man didn’t have a black and white world view, instead he lived beyond ‘good’ and ‘evil’. This does not mean that he was immoral or amoral, but simply that he understood that the nature is neither ‘good’ nor ‘evil’: e. g. the Sun can light up the world for you, but it can also blind you; it can warm you, but also burn you.

Balance was thus the key to success for the ‘primitive’ man. He needed the Sun to light up and warm his world, but he also needed it to stop doing so at one point. He needed the rain to fall, but he also needed it to stop doing so at one point. He needed a little bit of both, and he did his best to influcence this, by means of sorcery, and later also or instead through prayer and sacrifice. In this context, the Hooked Cross (or Sun Wheel) became the symbol of the Sun traveling across the firmament, and the Hammer became a symbol of the ability to cause rain (by striking the hammer against a rock in the sky, creating lightning and rainfall).

Detail from the Oseberg ship:

When he had enough sunshine and rain, he would be able to harvest what he needed from nature, and thus also got good health. Commonly, this fruit of nature was collected and then served in a cup, and thus the cup became a symbol of good health.

Remember this the next time you read about the attributes of kings, or ‘the holy grail’, of judges’ hammers, and other symbols still used today, even after 2000 years under a hostile and foreign cult.

HailaR WôðanaR!